+x Tim Dawson - 11/12/2019 11:41:55 AMThat data is delivered to us by DFS directly so if you ever find an error, let us know and we will pass it on to them.
+x Sergeij2000 - 11/12/2019 4:20:40 PM+x Tim Dawson - 11/12/2019 11:41:55 AMThat data is delivered to us by DFS directly so if you ever find an error, let us know and we will pass it on to them.So i still have to look into the pdf file to recognise any error? When my home base EDAZ switched to a new 8.33 kHz frequency, SK showed the old frequency in 'landing information" for several weeks, whereas the AIP approach plate already contained the correct frequency. BTW: I work as a flight instructor at a flight school in the Berlin (Germany) area and our "throughput" is between 35 to 50 pilots per year. We usually recommend SK to our students for flight planning and execution, which probably generates around 20 to 30 new SK subscriptions per year (most are using Apple devices). While SK is a great planning tool i always have to remember the students that they are required to "ascertain by every reasonable means" that the information they use for planning is current and comes from verifiable sources. That is the reason i recommend to subscribe to the German AIP VFR and directly use the AD data and plates from the pdf (they carry a publication date) instead of solely relying on the SK landing information.Best regardsJo
+x MarkusM - 11/12/2019 5:32:19 PM+x Sergeij2000 - 11/12/2019 4:20:40 PMSo i still have to look into the pdf file to recognise any error? When my home base EDAZ switched to a new 8.33 kHz frequency, SK showed the old frequency in 'landing information" for several weeks, whereas the AIP approach plate already contained the correct frequency. BTW: I work as a flight instructor at a flight school in the Berlin (Germany) area and our "throughput" is between 35 to 50 pilots per year. We usually recommend SK to our students for flight planning and execution, which probably generates around 20 to 30 new SK subscriptions per year (most are using Apple devices). While SK is a great planning tool i always have to remember the students that they are required to "ascertain by every reasonable means" that the information they use for planning is current and comes from verifiable sources. That is the reason i recommend to subscribe to the German AIP VFR and directly use the AD data and plates from the pdf (they carry a publication date) instead of solely relying on the SK landing information.Best regardsJoThe position appears to be - you pilots have to read the NOTAMs anyways and drawn pictures on a moving map navigational aid have no meaning, but are just decoration. If you don‘t believe, I‘ll let forward to you the messages. It comes down to the complete meaningless graphical information, especially if you face a German judge, and please do the favor to your students, teach to read the texts and forget all the fancy misleading aids on app basis. My opinion after taking quite some discussions.
+x Sergeij2000 - 11/12/2019 4:20:40 PMSo i still have to look into the pdf file to recognise any error? When my home base EDAZ switched to a new 8.33 kHz frequency, SK showed the old frequency in 'landing information" for several weeks, whereas the AIP approach plate already contained the correct frequency. BTW: I work as a flight instructor at a flight school in the Berlin (Germany) area and our "throughput" is between 35 to 50 pilots per year. We usually recommend SK to our students for flight planning and execution, which probably generates around 20 to 30 new SK subscriptions per year (most are using Apple devices). While SK is a great planning tool i always have to remember the students that they are required to "ascertain by every reasonable means" that the information they use for planning is current and comes from verifiable sources. That is the reason i recommend to subscribe to the German AIP VFR and directly use the AD data and plates from the pdf (they carry a publication date) instead of solely relying on the SK landing information.Best regardsJo